Method for encasing underground electrical cables

ABSTRACT

A method for encasing underground electrical cables, includes (a) providing a fresh concrete composition including a paste that includes a hydraulic binder, a mineral addition and water, the paste being present in a mixture with sand and aggregates, whereby the paste is present in the concrete composition in a volume of &lt;320 L/m 3  and/or the solid volume fraction of said paste is &gt;50 vol.-% and (b) placing the fresh concrete composition so as to encase the underground cables therewith.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to European Patent Application No. 18 290 068.8, filed Jun. 15, 2018, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD

The invention relates to a method for encasing underground electrical cables, comprising the steps of

(a) providing a fresh concrete composition comprising a paste that comprises a hydraulic binder, a mineral addition and water, said paste being present in a mixture with sand and aggregates.

BACKGROUND

Underground electrical cables are becoming increasingly popular, both for copper or less expensive aluminium based electrical cables. This approach has several advantages related to aesthetics and the protection of landscapes, as well as for increasing the level of protection of electrical supply networks in case of severe weather conditions.

Burying electrical cables brings some technical challenges, the main one being heat dissipation. Indeed, especially in the case of high voltage electrical cables, the heat generated by the cable can be significant. In the case of areal cables, the high volume of moving air that surrounds the cables is able to efficiently dissipate this heat. In the case of underground cables, heat must be allowed to dissipate, as the build-up of heat would result in physical degradation of the structure that surrounds the electrical cables.

Several methods are currently used for the underground installation of electrical cables. The simplest consists in the direct burial of the cables. This method, where the cables are directly laid in a trench and covered by soil, is easy and cheap to implement. However, the electrical cables are not well protected by any casing, and heat may not be dissipated adequately. This approach is suitable for low voltage electrical cables. Another method, called semi-direct burial, consists in encasing the electrical cables in flexible plastic conduits, typically made of high-density polyethylene (HDPE). This approach increases the level of protection of the underground cable, but is not suitable for high voltage cables, because of the low level of physical protection and because excess heat cannot be dissipated adequately.

Another method is to encase the electrical cables in concrete, which entirely surrounds the cables. Concrete, through adaptations of its composition, has the advantage of being a very versatile material, as it may provide excellent physical protection and/or enable good heat dissipation.

Concrete is a very widely used construction material with high ultimate strength and excellent durability. Furthermore, the material is able to flow while in its fresh state, enabling it to be easily transported, pumped, and placed before the setting and hardening actually take place. In addition to aggregates and water, it also contains a hydraulic binder such as Portland cement, which produces strength-forming phases by solidifying and curing in contact with water. Concrete based on Portland cement clinker is thus one of the most important binders worldwide.

For applications related to underground electric cables, especially high voltage electric cables, the thermal resistivity, expressed in m·K/W, or the thermal conductivity, expressed in W/m·K, of the surrounding material are of high importance. Cable surround materials of higher thermal resistivity prevent heat from being evacuated from the electrical cable to the surrounding ground. A current possible remedy to this is the use of electrical cables of larger diameter, which produce less heat as they have a lower electrical resistivity. However, the cost of such electrical cables is significantly higher. A cable surround material of lower thermal resistivity would allow cables of lower cost or smaller cross-section to be used. This means less amounts of raw materials are needed for the cables, lower transportation costs and more straightforward cable laying.

Encasing underground electrical cables with concrete can be done in two ways:

-   -   The fresh concrete is used to directly surround electrical         cables, or     -   The fresh concrete is used to surround the electrical cables         that are placed in a plastic, such as PVC, tube.

In case the fresh concrete is used to directly surround electrical cables, it is preferable that the concrete is excavatable, which means that its final compressive strength is less than 6 MPa, more preferentially less than 3 MPa.

In case the fresh concrete is used to surround electrical cables that are placed in a plastic tube, higher compressive strength concrete may be used, such as at least 20 MPa at 28 days.

EP 774446 A1 discloses a low thermal resistivity grout for surrounding high voltage electrical cables. The grout comprises a mixture of cement, water, bentonite and dolomite. The latter components are of particular interest to reduce the thermal resistivity of the grout. This technology enables to produce grouts, as shown in the examples, that have a thermal conductivity after 7 days of 1.21 and 1.24 W/K·m, corresponding to a thermal resistivity of 0.83 and 0.81 m·K/W, respectively.

WO 2016/180999 A1 discloses structural concretes and mortars useful for example in geothermal foundations of buildings. The compositions comprise three to six components and the low thermal resistivity is due mainly to the presence of a carbon containing component, such as natural or synthetic graphite, graphene and/or carbon nanotubes.

EP 3223380 A1 discloses a cable surround material for electrical cables, which comprises a mixture of a carbon containing material such as graphite petcoke, sand and cement. The carbon containing material is used to decrease the thermal resistivity of the material, and is used at a content comprised between 60 and 80 wt.-% of the cable surround material. The cable surround material disclosed in EP 3223380 A1 has a thermal resistivity at dry state comprised between 0.35 and 0.45 m·K/W.

In all these embodiments, the material used to surround electrical cables contains additional components that are required to decrease sufficiently the thermal resistivity of the material. This increases quite significantly the cost of the material, and poses additional issues related to sourcing the material. There is therefore a need for cable surround materials that have a low thermal resistivity and do not require the use of special carbon rich components.

SUMMARY

An aspect of this invention is directed to providing an electrical cable surround material that does not require the use of any carbon rich material, while providing sufficiently low thermal resistivity values for surrounding medium to high voltage underground electric cables.

In order to reach this objective, an embodiment of the invention provides for a method for encasing underground electrical cables, comprising the steps of

(a) providing a fresh concrete composition comprising a paste that comprises a hydraulic binder, a mineral addition and water, said paste being present in a mixture with sand and aggregates, wherein the paste is present in the fresh concrete composition in a volume of <320 L/m³ and/or the solid volume fraction of said paste is >50 vol.-%, and

(b) placing the fresh concrete composition so as to encase the underground cables therewith.

Minimizing the paste volume in the fresh concrete composition and maximizing the solid volume fraction of the paste each result in an increased overall content of the solid volume fraction of the fresh concrete composition, thereby reducing the water content. In particular, the fresh concrete composition of an aspect of the invention minimizes the amount of excess water that is not consumed by the hydration reaction and that may otherwise result in microscopic pores present in the concrete once hardened and dried.

In particular, it has been found that either selecting a paste volume in the fresh concrete composition of below 320 L/m³ or selecting the solid volume fraction of the paste above 50 vol.-% results in a sufficiently low thermal resistivity of the concrete once hardened and dried, and in particular results in a thermal resistivity of below 0.7 m·K/W, in particular below 0.6 m·K/W. Even better results may be achieved, if both measures are take simultaneously, i.e. the paste volume in the fresh concrete composition is kept below 320 L/m³ and the solid volume fraction of the paste is selected above 50 vol.-%.

By the instant invention the presence of carbon containing additives in the concrete composition for lowering thermal resistivity of the surrounding material may be avoided.

The solid volume fraction of the paste designates the volume content of all solid fractions in the paste, wherein the solid fractions comprise the hydraulic binder and the mineral addition(s), such as the limestone filler, silica flour and/or a hematite filler, but does not include sand and aggregates, since these latter components do not form part of the paste. The hydraulic binder and the mineral additions used for the calculation of the solid volume fraction have a maximum particle diameter of 0.25 mm.

According to an embodiment, the paste is present in the fresh concrete composition in a volume of <300 L/m³, for example <280 L/m³, and in another example <250 L/m³.

If the paste is present in the fresh concrete composition in a volume of <300 L/m³, the lower limit for the solid volume fraction of the paste can be reduced to 45 vol.-%.

In any case, maximizing the solid volume fraction of the paste will result in a particularly low thermal resistivity, wherein an embodiment provides for a solid volume fraction of the paste of >55 vol.-%, for example >60 vol.-%.

As to the reduced water content of the composition, an embodiment of the inventions provides that water is present in the fresh concrete composition in a volume of <170 L/m³, for example <140 L/m³, for example <125 L/m³, and in another example <100 L/m³.

Accordingly, in a separate aspect of the present invention, a fresh concrete composition is used for encasing underground electrical cables, comprising a paste that comprises a hydraulic binder, a mineral addition and water, said paste being present in a mixture with sand and aggregates, wherein water is present in the fresh concrete composition in a volume of <170 L/m³, for example <140 L/m³, for example <125 L/m³, and in another example <100 L/m³.

A low water content reduces the workability of the fresh concrete. In order to improve the workability of the fresh concrete mass, the mixture may comprise a water reducer, in particular a plasticiser or super-plasticiser, such as a polycarboxylate-based or a polynaphthalene sulfonate-based water reducer. A water reducer is a formulated product, most often in liquid form, that allows for reducing the amount of mixing water for a given workability or to increase flowability for a given water/binder ratio. By way of example of water reducers, mention may be made of lignosulphonates, hydroxycarboxylic acids, carbohydrates, and other specific organic compounds, for example glycerol, polyvinyl alcohol, sodium alumino-methyl-siliconate, sulfanilic acid and casein.

A water reducer is typically in liquid form, and is an aqueous formulation that has a solid content, or a dry extract, comprised between 15 and 40 wt.-%.

Super-plasticisers belong to a new class of water reducers and allow for reducing the amount of mixing water, for a given workability, by approximately 30 wt.-%. By way of example of a superplasticizer, the PCP super-plasticisers may be noted. The term “PCP” or “polyoxy polycarboxylate” is to be understood according to the present invention as a copolymer of acrylic acids or methacrylic acids and their esters of polyoxyethylene (POE).

In an embodiment, the composition comprises 1.5 to 12 kg per m³ of the fresh concrete composition of a water reducer, a plasticizer and/or a superplasticizer, which is in a liquid form.

A low content of hydraulic binder in the fresh concrete composition as is the case for excavatable concrete may entail the risk of segregation of some components in the fresh concrete mixture. In order to prevent segregation, the mixture may comprise a viscosity modifying agent, such as a high molecular weight gum.

The term fresh concrete as used herein designates the wet mix of concrete ingredients before they begin to set. In other words, fresh concrete is that stage of concrete, in which concrete can be moulded and is in its plastic state.

According to an embodiment of the invention, the hydraulic binder comprises Portland cement. In an embodiment, cement of the types CEM I, CEM II, CEM III, CEM IV or CEM V can be used. For example, the hydraulic binder is a cement of the type CEM I, CEM II or CEM III. In another example, the hydraulic binder is a cement, that comprises >95 wt.-% of Portland cement.

The European norm EN 197-1 of April 2012 defines five classes of common cement that comprise Portland cement as a main constituent.

-   -   CEM I (Portland cement) comprising Portland cement and up to 5         wt.-% of minor additional constituents,     -   CEM II (Portland-composite cement) comprising Portland cement         and up to 35 wt.-% of other single constituents,     -   CEM III (Blast furnace cement) comprising Portland cement and         higher percentages of blast furnace slag,     -   CEM IV (Pozzolanic cement) comprising Portland cement and up to         55 wt.-% of pozzolanic constituents,     -   CEM V (Composite cement) comprising Portland cement, blast         furnace slag or fly ash and pozzolans.

Alternatively, the hydraulic binder used in an embodiment of the invention is a cement that is prepared by mixing Portland cement with a mineral component such a ground slag, fly ash, ground limestone, or pozzolanic constituents or a mixture thereof. The mixing step of Portland cement and mineral components can for example be carried while preparing the concrete.

Various aspects of the invention refers both to an excavatable concrete material that surrounds electrical cables, and to a non-excavatable concrete material that is used to encase electric cables that are placed in plastic tubes. Excavatable concrete is characterized by a 28d compressive strength of the concrete of 1.0-5.0 MPa. Non-excavatable concrete is characterized by a 28d compressive strength of the concrete of >20 MPa.

In order to obtain an excavatable concrete, the hydraulic binder, in particular Portland cement, is in an embodiment present in the fresh concrete composition in an amount of 15-40 kg/m³.

In order to obtain a non-excavatable concrete, the hydraulic binder, in particular Portland cement, is in an embodiment present in the fresh concrete composition in an amount of 150-500 kg/m³.

In order to minimize the paste volume of the concrete, the aggregate skeleton packing density may be maximized. In an embodiment, the skeleton packing density of the aggregate is selected to be >0.69, for example >0.71.

One possible way of maximizing the skeleton density of the aggregate is to use natural (and therefore rounded) sand instead of manufacture sand.

In order to maximize the solid volume fraction of the paste, fine mineral additives may be present in the paste. In an embodiment, a limestone filler or a siliceous filler (fine quartz and/or silica flour) or a mixture of limestone filler and a siliceous filler is used as the mineral addition.

In an embodiment, the mineral additive, in particular the limestone filler, has a particle size distribution that is characterised by a D50 of ≤10 μm, for example 5-10 μm, and/or a D98 of ≤100 μm, for example 90-100 μm.

According to an embodiment of the invention, the mineral addition comprises a hematite filler. In particular, a hematite filler is used as the mineral addition. Hematite is a mineral form of iron(III) oxide (Fe₂O₃) and has the effect of further reducing the thermal resistivity of the concrete.

In an embodiment, a magnetite sand and/or magnetite aggregate is used. Magnetite (Fe₃O₄) also is useful for reducing the thermal resistivity of the concrete.

An embodiment of the invention provides an electric cable surround material that has a particularly low thermal resistivity. In an embodiment, the fresh concrete, after having been placed, is allowed to harden and dry, wherein the thermal resistivity of the concrete once hardened and dried is <0.7 m·K/W, for example <0.6 m·K/W, for example <0.5 m·K/W, and in another example <0.4 m·K/W.

An embodiment of the invention provides a fresh concrete composition that allows to use ordinary materials that are easily available in concrete plants, such as natural or manufactured sand, lime/siliceous aggregate, cement, lime/siliceous filler. In particular, the fresh concrete composition can be free from a material having a thermal conductivity of >10 W/m·K, for example >20 W/m·K, such as a carbon containing component, such as natural or synthetic graphite, graphene and/or carbon nanotubes. The fresh concrete composition is also free of metals, such as steel or aluminium, in the form of fibres or particles.

However, the invention does not exclude the presence of a carbon containing component, such as natural or synthetic graphite, graphene and/or carbon nanotubes, in order to further reduce the thermal resistivity.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the following examples.

In the examples fresh concrete compositions were mixed according to the following process. The fresh concrete mixes were obtained by means of a ZYCLOS type mixer. The whole operation has been carried out at 20° C. The method of preparation comprises the following steps:

-   -   At T=0 seconds: charging the cement and the sand in a bowl mixer         and mixing during 7 minutes (15 rpm);     -   At T=7 minutes: adding water and half of the weight of additive         (superplasticizer) and mix for 1 minute (15 rpm);     -   At T=8 minutes: adding the rest of the additive         (superplasticizer) and mix for 1 minute (15 rpm);     -   At T=9 minutes: mixing for 8 minutes (50 rpm); and     -   At T=17 minutes: mixing for 1 minute (15 rpm);     -   At T=18 minutes: pouring the concrete on the level into a mould.

The performance of the fresh concrete mixes was measured according to the following process. Concrete slump and strength measurements were carried out as described in the standard NF EN 206 published in November 2016. Strength was measured on 10 cm×10 cm×10 cm cubes. The thermal resistivity, including definition of the dry state, was measured using a Decagon device (KD2 pro with probe RK-1) according to the standard IEEE 442, on concrete cubes (10 cm×10 cm×10 cm) dried at 105° C. until constant mass and cooled in desiccator to room temperature.

In the examples below, the thermal resistivity is measured when the material is dry as described above. If the material still contains some free water, the thermal resistivity would decrease.

Example 1

Fresh compositions for excavatable concrete with the mix designs indicated in Table 1 have been prepared and allowed to harden and dry. The performance parameters of the concrete compositions have been determined and are listed in Table 2.

An analysis of the examples allows to draw the following conclusions.

Mix design C02 is a prior art mix design with limestone as a mineral filler material.

In the mix design C03, limestone filler was replaced by fly ash, wherein the performance measurements show that the thermal resistivity did not decrease, but increased.

A comparison of the mix designs C04 and C05 with C02 shows that reducing the water content of the fresh concrete composition results in a reduction of the thermal resistivity, and also increases the compressive strength.

A comparison of the mix designs C12 and C14 reveals that reducing the paste volume (i.e. the volume of water, binder and limestone filler) decreases the thermal resistivity.

A comparison of the mix designs C13 and C13B shows the effect of the type of gravel, wherein using a siliceous type gravel (sourced from La Gerbaudière) results in a reduced thermal resistivity when compared to a siliceous-lime gravel (sourced from Saint Bonnet).

A comparison of the mix designs C23 and C23B shows the effect of the type of sand on the thermal resistivity, wherein natural rounded sand results in a reduced thermal resistivity when compared to manufactured and washed sand.

The mix design C41 was identified as the reference mix design having a very low thermal resistivity of 0.47 (m·K)/W.

With the mix design C41 Sflour, the limestone filler was partly replaced by silica flour, in order to further decrease thermal resistivity.

The mix design C41 MAGN shows that the use of Fe₃O₄ sands and gravel further decreases the thermal resistivity.

With the mix design C41 Hema, the limestone filler was partly replaced by a Fe₂O₃ filler, which further decreases the thermal resistivity.

A comparison of the mix designs C11 and C41 shows that the use of carbon can be avoided by mix design optimization, the specific concrete mix design is more important than the conductive additives.

TABLE 1 Unit C02 C03 C04 C05 C11 C12 C14 C13 C13B CEM I - CEM I 52.5 N Saint Pierre kg/m³ 40 40 40 40 25 41 36 39 39 La Cour Limestone filler St beat Omya kg/m³ 360 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Limestone filler Cat. A - BL200 kg/m³ 0 0 405 460 360 373 322 351 351 (Omya) Fly ash Cordemais kg/m³ 0 360 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Silica flour (siliceous fine filler) kg/m³ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hematite filler kg/m³ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Synthetic graphite kg/m³ 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 Micro sand Sibelco Be01 kg/m³ 182 167 184 184 184 179 192 193 193 Crushed and washed sand 0/4 kg/m³ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 779 779 (Petit Craz) Natural sand 0/5 (Saint Bonnet) kg/m³ 734 674 742 742 756 720 773 0 0 Aggregates 5/10 (Saint Bonnet) kg/m³ 788 723 797 797 815 773 831 837 0 Aggregates 4/10 (La Gerbaudière) kg/m³ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 985 F₃O₄ sand 0/2 (Garrot-Chaillac) kg/m³ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F₃O₄ sand 0/6 (Garrot-Chaillac) kg/m³ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F₃O₄ sand 4/16 (Garrot-Chaillac) kg/m³ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Superplasticizer Chryso Optima kg/m³ 4 0 1.78 2.00 1.54 1.24 1.43 5.60 5.60 203 Kelcocrete (viscosity modifying kg/m³ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 agent) Superplasticizer Chryso Optima kg/m³ 0 5.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 206 Total effective water L/m³ 175 204 154 134 115 183 155 138 138 Air L/m³ 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 C41 C41 C41 C41 C23 C23B Hema Slfour MAGN CEM I - CEM I 52.5 N Saint Pierre 15 36 36 15 15 15 La Cour Limestone filler St beat Omya 0 0 0 0 0 0 Limestone filler Cat. A - BL200 370 415 415 248 248 370 (Omya) Fly ash Cordemais 0 0 0 0 0 0 Silica flour (siliceous fine filler) 0 0 0 0 116 0 Hematite filler 0 0 0 196 0 0 Synthetic graphite 0 0 0 0 0 0 Micro sand Sibelco Be01 79 192 192 79 79 0 Crushed and washed sand 0/4 681 0 773 681 681 0 (Petit Craz) Natural sand 0/5 (Saint Bonnet) 0 773 0 0 0 0 Aggregates 5/10 (Saint Bonnet) 1175 831 831 1175 1175 0 Aggregates 4/10 (La Gerbaudière) 0 0 0 0 0 0 F₃O₄ sand 0/2 (Garrot-Chaillac) 0 0 0 0 0 1033 F₃O₄ sand 0/6 (Garrot-Chaillac) 0 0 0 0 0 1590 F₃O₄ sand 4/16 (Garrot-Chaillac) 0 0 0 0 0 1056 Superplasticizer Chryso Optima 7.70 1.43 1.43 7.70 7.70 7.70 203 Kelcocrete (viscosity modifying 0.0015 0.0036 0.0036 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 agent) Superplasticizer Chryso Optima 0 0 0 0 0 0 206 Total effective water 90 121 121 90 90 90 Air 20 20 20 20 20 20

TABLE 2 Paste Solid Thermal Compressive volume volume resistivity strength at without fraction at dry state Slump 28 days air of paste Unit (m · K)/W cm MPa L/m³ % C02 0.81 >20 2.0 320 45.3 C03 0.90 >20 2.0 358 43.0 C04 0.62 >20 2.7 316 51.2 C05 0.56 >20 4.9 316 57.6 C11 0.52 >20 1.9 301 61.8 C12 0.84 >20 1.1 333 45.1 C14 0.66 >20 1.5 285 45.6 C13 0.69 >20 2.0 280 50.6 C13B 0.63 >20 2.0 280 50.6 C41 0.47 >20 2.0 231 61.0 C23 0.54 >20 1.9 285 57.5 C23B 0.65 >20 4.9 285 57.5 C41 0.44 >20 1.9 228 60.5 Hema C41 0.45 >20 2.0 229 60.7 Sfour C41 0.46 >20 1.7 231 61.0 MAGN

Examples 2

Fresh compositions for non-excavatable concrete with the mix designs indicated in tables 3 to 6 have been prepared and allowed to harden and dry. The performance parameters of the concrete compositions have been determined and are also listed in tables 3 to 6.

TABLE 3 Material Dosage, kg/m³ Cement (CEM I) 220 Limestone filler BL 200 281 Orgon silica fume 22 Washed sand 0/4 682 Natural round gravel 1051 (5/10) Superplasticizer (Chryso 11 Optima 100) Effective water 129 Paste volume 310 L/m³ Paste solid volume 0.59 fraction (without air) Aggregate packing 0.68 density Slump 25 cm Thermal resistivity at 0.35 m · K/W dry state compressive strength at 60 MPa 28 day

TABLE 4 Material Dosage, kg/m³ Cement (CEM I) 159 limestone filler saint 220 Beat silica fume 55.9 ultrafine limestone 73.1 filler omyacoat 850 fine sand la sabliere 132.3 CCSH washed sand 0/4 682 natural round gravel 1080 (5/20) superplasticizer (Chryso 11 Optima 100) effective water 127 Paste volume 309 L/m³ paste solid volume 0.59 fraction (without air) slump >25 cm aggregate packing 0.71 density thermal resistivity at 0.31 m · K/W dry state compressive strength at 70 MPa 28 day

TABLE 5 Material Dosage, kg/m³ Cement (CEM I) 207 Fine limestone filler 297 Betoflow D SL silica fume 39 washed sand 0/4 687 natural round gravel 1066 (5/10) superplasticizer (Chryso 5.4 Optima 203) effective water 105 Paste volume 298 L/m³ paste solid volume 0.64 fraction (without air) slump >25 cm aggregate packing 0.68 density thermal resistivity at 0.33 m · K/W dry state compressive strength at 76 MPa 28 day

TABLE 6 Material Dosage, kg/m³ Cement (CEM I) 462 silica fume 30 washed sand 0/4 687 natural round gravel 1066 (5/10) superplasticizer (Chryso 4.9 Optima 203) effective water 138 Paste volume 298 L/m³ paste solid volume 0.54 fraction (without air) slump >25 cm aggregate packing 0.68 density thermal resistivity at 0.4 m · K/W dry state compressive strength at 92 MPa 28 day 

1. A method for encasing underground electrical cables, comprising (a) providing a fresh concrete composition comprising a paste that comprises a hydraulic binder, a mineral addition and water, said paste being in a mixture with sand and aggregates, whereby the paste is present in the fresh concrete composition in a volume of <320 L/m³ and/or the solid volume fraction of said paste is >50 vol.-%, and (b) placing said fresh concrete composition so as to encase the underground cables therewith.
 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the paste is present in the fresh concrete composition in a volume of <300 L/m³.
 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the paste is present in the fresh concrete composition in a volume of <300 L/m³ and the solid volume fraction of said paste is >45 vol.-%.
 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the solid volume fraction of said paste is >55 vol.-%.
 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein water is present in the fresh concrete composition in a volume of <170 L/m³.
 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the fresh concrete composition comprises 1.5 to 12 kg per m³ of the fresh concrete composition of a water reducer, a plasticizer or a superplasticizer.
 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein Portland cement is used as said hydraulic binder.
 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the hydraulic binder is present in the fresh concrete composition in an amount of 15-40 kg/m³.
 9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the hydraulic binder is present in the fresh concrete composition in an amount of 150-500 kg/m³.
 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein a limestone filler or a siliceous filler, such as fine quartz and/or silica flour, or a mixture of limestone filler and a siliceous filler is used as said mineral addition.
 11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the mineral additive has a particle size distribution that is characterised by a D50 of ≤10 μm and/or a D98 of ≤100 μm.
 12. The method according to claim 1, wherein a hematite filler is used as said mineral addition.
 13. The method according to claim 1, wherein a magnetite sand and/or magnetite aggregate is used.
 14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the skeleton packing density of the aggregate is selected to be >0.69.
 15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the fresh concrete composition comprises a super-plasticiser.
 16. The method according to claim 1, wherein the fresh concrete, after having been placed, is allowed to harden and dry, wherein the thermal resistivity of the concrete once hardened and dried is <0.7 m·K/W.
 17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the 28d compressive strength of the concrete is 1.0-5.0 MPa.
 18. The method according to claim 16, wherein the 28d compressive strength of the concrete is >20 MPa.
 19. The method according to claim 1, wherein the concrete composition is free from a material having a thermal conductivity of >10 W/m·K.
 20. The method according to claim 19, wherein the concrete composition is free from a material having a thermal conductivity of >20 W/m·K. 